Mechanical and antibacterial investigations of TiO₂ and MgO nanoparticles for medical application
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56053/10.4.2135Keywords:
TiO2 NPs, MgO NPs, Hardness, Contact angle, Antibacterial efficacyAbstract
The research examines the effect of reinforcing silicone rubber (SR) with TiO₂ nanoparticles (TiO₂ NPs) and MgO nanoparticles (MgO NPs) at a selected ratio 2wt.%, 3wt.% and 4wt.%. silicone rubber is prepared as matrix and reinforced by these two types of NPs separately. The evaluation on the effect of some physical, mechanical and biological property of the prepared bio-composite are performed. Including hardness, wettability, and bacterial colony formation (CFU) testing, along with field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) examination to monitor the distribution of nanoparticles on the surface of the samples. wettability test results showed a gradual increase in contact angle values with increasing NPs concentration. silicone rubber sample SR/MgO-4 recorded the highest value at 101.6°, while the control sample recorded 94.91°. This indicates an increased hydrophobicity of the rubber surface after the addition of nanoparticles. A gradual increase in hardness values is observed with ratio portion for both NPs used. Bacteriological testing also revealed a significant decrease in the number of bacterial colonies growing on the enriched samples compared to the control sample, indicating that the nanoparticles used possess antibacterial activity. Finally, FESEM images further supported these findings by showing the NPs distribution and the variation in the nature of the agglomerations depending on effect of NPs proportion.
Downloads
References
-[1] M. Zare, E. R. Ghomi, P. D. Venkatraman, S. Ramakrishna, Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 138 (2021) 50969. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.50969
-[2] H. I. Ahmed, AIP Conference Proceedings, 2235 (2020) 020038. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0008922
-[3] M. Niţuică et al., Leather and Footwear Journal, 19 (2019) 227. https://doi.org/10.24264/lfj.19.4.7
-[4] S. Abbas, A. Hadier, S. Al-Musawi, B. Taha, Journal of Applied Sciences and Nanotechnology, 4 (2024) 53. https://doi.org/10.53293/jasn.2024.7213.1251
-[5] Haneen Khaled Naji Al-Samarrai, Osama Nadhom Nijris, Mohammed Fadhil AboKsou, Experimental and Theoretical NANOTECHNOLOGY, 9 (2025), 529 https://doi.org/10.56053/9.4.529
-[6] N. Yousif, S. Al-Jawad, A. Taha, H. Stamatis, Journal of Applied Sciences and Nanotechnology, 3 (2023) 18. https://doi.org/10.53293/jasn.2022.5179.1165
-[7] H. I. Ahmed, AIP Conference Proceedings, 2235 (2020) 020038. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0008913
-[8] H. Ali, N. Hameed, Journal of Applied Sciences and Nanotechnology, 2 (2022) 115. https://doi.org/10.53293/jasn.2022.4532.1122
-[9] A. Cordoba, E. M. Rivera-Muñoz, R. Velázquez-Castillo, K. Esquivel, Nanomaterials, 13 (2023) 1699. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13101699
-[10] Mais Qasem Mohammed, Ahmed Hamed Mahde Shugran, Experimental and Theoretical NANOTECHNOLOGY, 10 (2026), 13 https://doi.org/10.56053/10.1.13
-[11] T. Fischer, S. Suttor, S. Mansi, L. Osthues, P. Mela, Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 138 (2021) 51352. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.51352
-[12] Aysha Sh. Hasan, Aysha Sh. Hasan, Mustafa N. Taifor, Nawzad J. Mahmood, Beyza Gavcar, Experimental and Theoretical NANOTECHNOLOGY, 10 (2026), 427 https://doi.org/10.56053/10.2.427
-[13] A. F. Hussein, Z. N. R. Alraziqi, S. M. M., AIP Conference Proceedings, 2026 (2026) 020048. https://doi.org/10.1063/12.0046444
-[14] ASTM International, ASTM D2240, Standard Test Method for Rubber Property—Durometer Hardness, West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2005.
-[15] H. M. Naguib, E. O. Taha, A. S. El-Deeb, M. M. A. Kader, M. A. Ahmed, Polymer Bulletin, 81 (2024) 9795. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-024-05170-8
-[16] Y. Han, S. Kiat-amnuay, J. M. Powers, Y. Zhao, Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 100 (2008) 465. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60266-8
-[17] A. Atmakuri, A. Palevicius, M. Siddabathula, Analysis of Mechanical and Wettability Properties of Natural Fiber-Reinforced Epoxy Hybrid Composites, 2020.
-[18] A. S. Nobrega, A. M. Andreotti, A. Moreno, M. A. C. Sinhoreti, D. M. dos Santos, M. C. Goiato, Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 116 (2016) 623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.03.004
-[19] N. K. Sonnahalli, R. Chowdhary, Journal of Prosthodontic Research, 64 (2020) 431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2019.12.001
-[20] H. A. Sharhan, Z. N. Rasheed, J. K. Oleiwi, Key Engineering Materials, 911 (2022) 9. https://doi.org/10.4028/p-197rys
-[21] A. L. Naidu, D. Raghuveer, P. Suman, Studies on Characterization and Mechanical Behavior of Banana Peel Reinforced Epoxy Composites, 4 (2013) 844.
-[22] V. Kochkodan, S. Tsarenko, N. Potapchenko, V. Kosinova, V. Goncharuk, Desalination, 220 (2008) 380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2007.01.042
-[23] H. Hajizadeh, S. J. Peighambardoust, S. H. Peighambardoust, D. Peressini, Journal of Food Science, 85 (2020) 1193. https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.15079
-[24] S. Jagadeeshan, R. Parsanathan, Nano-metal Oxides for Antibacterial Activity, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04477-0_3
Y. Chen, X. Tang, X. Gao, B. Zhang, Y. Luo, X. Yao, Ceramics International, 45 (2019) 15505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.05.054