Peer Review

All submitted manuscript will be preliminary checked by technical editor to determine whether it is properly prepared. Manuscript that are not prepared in accordance with author instructions will be returned to the authors for revision and resubmission. Afterwards, the technical editor will be checking every manuscript by Turnitin similarity detection service. Turnitin reports and manuscripts will be sent to editor-in-chief to preliminary consideration. They will determine whether the manuscript fits the scope of the journal and whether it has scientific importance. Based on Turnitin reports and preliminary evaluation, the editor-in-chief will decide whether the manuscript will be sent to Peer-Review or rejected.

All manuscripts that have passed the initial inspection will be assigned to independent reviewers to peer review. The reviewers that were suggested by the authors can also be considered, but they should not have published with any of the authors. Editor-in-chief give comments about the manuscript, too. Based on the comments and referee’s reports will be make decision to accept, revise (minor and major revision) and reject. The revised papers will be considered by editor-in-chief. Final decision about accepting or rejecting will be verified by editor-in chief.

Proofs

Proofs should be carefully checked by corresponding Author and returned on time to Editors.

Paper Processing Charge

Copyright

Open Access authors retain the copyrights of their papers, and all open access papers are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.