Effect of bacterial biological factors on reducing incidence and severity of cucumber root rot disease

Authors

  • Noora A. Al-Mothafar College of Science for Women, Department of Biology, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq Author
  • Ibrahim Ali ibrahim Plant Protection Directorate, Ministry of Agriculture, Baghdad, Abu-Greab, Iraq Author
  • Mohammed Al Hakeem Plant Protection Directorate, Ministry of Agriculture, Baghdad, Abu-Greab, Iraq Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56053/10.4.2107

Keywords:

R. solani, Antifungal bacteria, Nanoparticles, Cucumber root rot, Bacillus rugosus

Abstract

This investigation is carried out.in the laboratories of the Plant Protection Directorate, Ministry of Agriculture, to evaluate the pathogenicity of eleven fungal isolates obtained from the roots of diseased cucumber plants, and to assess the efficacy of three bacterial strains—Bacillus cereus, Bacillus thuringiensis, and Bacillus rugosus— in minimizing the incidence and severity of cucumber root rot induced by Rhizoctonia solani under pot conditions. Biologically synthesized nanoparticles, particularly silver nanoparticles (AgNPs), have shown strong antimicrobial activity against a wide range of plant pathogenic fungi. The results showed that all fungal isolates significantly reduced seed germination and increasing intensity of the illness. Isolates of R. solani are particularly aggressive, with four isolates completely inhibiting seed germination and causing 100% disease severity. The remaining isolates resulted in germination rates ranging from 30% to 93.3%, and severity levels between 13.3% and 46.7%, compared to the healthy control (100% germination, 0% severity). Nucleotide sequence analysis confirmed the identity of the fungal isolates as R. solani, Fusarium oxysporum, and Macrophomina phaseolina, and the sequences are deposited in GenBank under accession numbers PP892963.1, PQ810062, and PV008703.1, respectively. All three bacterial strains significantly reduced disease incidence and severity, with B. rugosus showing the greatest effect, followed by B. cereus and B. thuringiensis, reducing disease incidence to 6.6%, 26.6%, and 63.3% and severity to 23.3%, 43.3%, and 73.3%, respectively.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

-[1] Sura Hameed Ahmed Ali, Sarah Abdulsalam Hattab, Wafaa Mahdi Salih, Sanaa Mahdi Salih, Experimental and Theoretical NANOTECHNOLOGY, 9 (2025), 247 https://doi.org/10.56053/9.S.247

-[2] Kamil Jawad, Hani Mizhir, Malik N. Hawas, Experimental and Theoretical NANOTECHNOLOGY, 9 (2025), 259 https://doi.org/10.56053/9.S.259

-[3] K. D. Al-Jebory, M. A. Almashhadani, The Iraqi Journal of Agricultural Science, 49 (2018) 777. https://doi.org/10.36103/ijas.v49i3.108

-[4] A. Pierzgalski, et al., Toxins, 13 (2021) 768. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins13110768

-[5] A. Šišić, et al., Scientific Reports, 8 (2018) 1. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-19779-z

-[6] I. A. Ibrahim, H. H. Al-Juboory, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1371 (2024) 032024. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1371/3/032024

-[7] J. R. Lamichhane, C. Dürr, A. A. Schwanck, M. H. Robin, J. P. Sarthou, V. Cellier, et al., Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 37 (2017) 10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-017-0417-y

-[8] O. A. Fasusi, C. Cruz, O. Babalola, Agriculture, 11 (2021) 163. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11020163

-[9] K. Liu, J. A. McInroy, C. H. Hu, J. W. Kloepper, Plant Disease, 102 (2018) 67. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-04-17-0478-RE

-[10] K. Raymaekers, et al., Biological Control, 144 (2020) 104240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2020.104240

-[11] Mahdi Hasan Suhail, Zina A. Al Shadidi, Qudama Kh. Hammad, Saja Neama Kareem, Experimental and Theoretical NANOTECHNOLOGY, 9 (2025), 273 https://doi.org/10.56053/9.S.273

-[12] Awatiff A. Mohammed, Seenaa I. Hussein, Nadia A. Ali, Ahmed Q. Abdullah, Hassan A. Ashoor, Experimental and Theoretical NANOTECHNOLOGY, 9 (2025), 287 https://doi.org/10.56053/9.S.287

-[13] M. B. Malook, M. Ijaz, R. Ijaz, J. Shang, L. Lv, T. Ahmed, et al., Environmental Science: Nano, 13 (2026) 723. https://doi.org/10.1039/D5EN00936G

-[14] R. I. Omara, T. A. Essa, A. A. Khalil, M. M. Elsharkawy, Egyptian Journal of Biological Pest Control, 30 (2020) 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41938-020-00284-3

-[15] Muna M. Abbas, Amal K. Jassim, Lamia K. Abbas, Experimental and Theoretical NANOTECHNOLOGY, 9 (2025), 297 https://doi.org/10.56053/9.S.297

-[16] Zainab Naseer Hasheem, Estabraq Talib Abdullah, Experimental and Theoretical NANOTECHNOLOGY, 9 (2025), 303 https://doi.org/10.56053/9.S.303

-[17] R. E. Majeed, I. A. Ibrahem, O. S. Shukur, SABRAO Journal of Breeding and Genetics, 55 (2023) 1369. https://doi.org/10.54910/sabrao2023.55.4.30

-[18] S. M. K. Wasan, W. A. Al-Juboori, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1225 (2023) 012031. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1225/1/012031

-[19] Sundus A. Abdullah Albakri, Aya F. Ibrahim, Hawraa A. Hussein, Experimental and Theoretical NANOTECHNOLOGY, 9 (2025), 311 https://doi.org/10.56053/9.S.311

-[20] Rusul Adnan Al-wardy, Experimental and Theoretical NANOTECHNOLOGY, 9 (2025), 327 https://doi.org/10.56053/9.S.327

-[21] E. Kadri, et al., Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 705 (2017) 708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.02.117

-[22] Ahmed S. Hassan, Jasim H. Kadhum, Sarmad Najah ALSalhy, Osama T. Al-Taai, Experimental and Theoretical NANOTECHNOLOGY, 9 (2025), 335 https://doi.org/10.56053/9.S.335

-[23] M. I. Robab, W. Uddin, N. Begum, International Journal of Plant & Soil Science, 38 (2026) 61 https://doi.org/10.9734/ijpss/2026/v38i46030

-[24] S. Pradhan, M. K. Jena, International Journal of Plant & Soil Science, 35 (2023) 1904 https://doi.org/10.9734/ijpss/2023/v35i183473

-[25] R. Tjimune, E. Mangwende, M. Lekota, N. Muzhinji, New Disease Reports, 45 (2022) 99 https://doi.org/10.1002/ndr2.12066

-[26] R. Mahtab, D. S. Alireza, A. Abasali, S. N. A. Masoud, World Applied Sciences Journal, 21 (2013) 129. https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.wasj.2013.21.1.2452

-[27] N. Khana, et al., Toxicology Reports, 5 (2018) 970. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxrep.2018.08.016.

-[28] H. I. Ahmed, AIP Conference Proceedings, 2235 (2020) 020038. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0008913

-[29] H. Hasan, A. Nooruldeen, H. I. Ahmed, and M. J. Jaafer, Periodicals of Engineering and Natural Sciences (PEN), 8 (2020) 2 727. https://doi.org/10.21533/pen.v8.i2.1100

-[30] M. M. I. Afifi, A. M. Ismail, S. M. Kamel, T. A. Essa, Journal of Plant Pathology, 99 (2017) 61. https://doi.org/10.4454/jpp.v99i1.3810

-[31] H. I. Ahmed, AIP Conference Proceedings, 2235 (2020) 020038. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0008913

-[32] A. Tony, R. Clarison, Experimental and Theoretical NANOTECHNOLOGY, 9 (2025), 347 https://doi.org/10.56053/9.2.347

-[33] Sahni, B. D. Prasad, International Journal of Plant & Soil Science, 33 (2021) 12 https://doi.org/10.9734/ijpss/2021/v33i1530506

-[34] R. S. Mahmood, et al., Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Materials, 34 (2025) 1. https://doi.org/10.1515/jmbm-2025-0040

-[35] R. Rajput, A. Sharma, M. Rathod, D. Katiyar, International Journal of Plant & Soil Science, 35 (2023) 184 https://doi.org/10.9734/ijpss/2023/v35i213961

-[36] Safa Salah Salman, Asaad T. Al-Douri, Albosale Abbas Hadi, Saeb Jasim Mohammed Alnajm, Experimental and Theoretical NANOTECHNOLOGY, 9 (2025), 361 https://doi.org/10.56053/9.2.361

Downloads

Published

2026-10-15

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Effect of bacterial biological factors on reducing incidence and severity of cucumber root rot disease. (2026). Experimental and Theoretical NANOTECHNOLOGY, 10(4), 2107-2118. https://doi.org/10.56053/10.4.2107