Role of Fe doping on crystallographic and functional characteristics of ceramic TiO2

Authors

  • Mojahid M. Najim Nanomaterials Research Center, University of Anbar, Ramadi, Iraq Author
  • Ban A. Yousif Department of Applied Science, University of Technology- Iraq, Baghdad 10066, Iraq Author
  • M. Al Nuaimi College of Production Engineering & Metallurgy, University of Technology- Iraq, Baghdad 10066, Iraq Author
  • Wasan A. Hekmat University of Technology, College of Laser and Optoelectronics Engineering, Optoelectronics Engineering Department Author
  • Saad Maadh Alhiti Nanomaterials Research Center, University Of Anbar, Ramadi, Iraq Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56053/10.4.2057

Keywords:

TiO2, Fe doping, Hydrothermal, XRD, Ceramic

Abstract

The undoped and Fe doped (0.1, 0.3, 5 wt%) TiO 2 powders (T0, T1, T3, T5) are prepared by hydrothermal synthesis. The goal is to investigate the effect of adding Fe on the crystal structure, particle morphology, elemental distribution, vibrational properties and density of the ceramic. The precursor mixtures are heated at 180 °C for 12 h, the powders are dried at 80 °C for 12 h and calcined at 500 °C for 2 h. The ceramic pellets are then created by uniaxial pressing at 250 MPa and sintering at 900°C for 3 hours. The materials are examined using X-ray diffraction (XRD), field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM), energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) with elemental mapping, Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, Raman spectroscopy, and Archimedes density and porosity measurements. XRD examination revealed that anatase is the most visible crystalline phase in the calcined powders. The observed average crystallite size dropped from 27.9 nm (T0) to 25.2 nm (T1), 21.8 nm (T3), and 19.3 nm (T5). FESEM analysis revealed a drop in average particle size from 82 ± 9 nm for T0 to 68 ± 7 nm, 52 ± 5 nm, and 46 ± 5 nm for T1, T3, and T5, respectively. EDS found Fe in Fe-containing materials, while FTIR showed a change in the major Ti-O absorption band from 612 cm⁻¹ (T0) to 601 cm⁻¹ (T5). The sintered T3 pellets had the highest bulk density (3.87 ± 0.02 g cm⁻³) and lowest apparent porosity (2.35 ± 0.15%), compared to 3.76 ± 0.03 g.cm⁻³ and 4.10 ± 0.20%, respectively, for T0. At 5 wt.% Fe, bulk density decreased to 3.82 ± 0.03 g.cm⁻³, while apparent porosity increased to 3.18 ± 0.21%. Fe addition affects the structural and morphological properties of TiO₂, with 3 wt.% nominal Fe resulting in the highest densification under the sintering circumstances tested.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

-[1] T. Sugiyama, A. H. A. Dabwan, H. Katsumata, T. Suzuki, S. Kaneco, Open Journal of Inorganic Non-metallic Materials, 4 (2014) 28. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojinm.2014.43005

-[2] N. A. Quiroz, D. J. R. Gutierrez, S. S. Martínez, C. L. Bahena, International Journal of Geosciences, 2 (2011) 669. https://doi.org/10.4236/ijg.2011.24068

-[3] C. Kaewtip, K. Accanit, N. Chaowai, K. Areerat, P. Reanjaruan, V. Boonumnauyvitaya, Advances in Materials Physics and Chemistry, 2 (2012) 40. https://doi.org/10.4236/ampc.2012.24B012

-[4] P. Ctibor, V. Stengl, Z. Pala, Chemical Science International Journal, 3 (2013) 387. https://doi.org/10.9734/ACSJ/2013/4745

-[5] E. Alzahrani, American Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 8 (2017) 95. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajac.2017.81008

-[6] A. M. Hamid, H. W. Hassan, F. A. Osman, Asian Journal of Physical and Chemical Sciences, 7 (2019) 1. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajopacs/2019/v7i330094

-[7] A. Hajjaji, A. Atyaoui, K. Trabelsi, M. Amlouk, L. Bousselmi, B. Bessais, M. A. El Khakani, M. Gaidi, American Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 5 (2014) 473. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajac.2014.58056

-[8] J. I. Arishi, J. Ozuomba, Chemical Science International Journal, 24 (2018) 1. https://doi.org/10.9734/CSJI/2018/43904

-[9] T. E. Amakoromo, Chemical Science International Journal, 31 (2022) 21. https://doi.org/10.9734/CSJI/2022/v31i4816

-[10] F. Jabli, R. Alshammari, Journal of Materials Science and Chemical Engineering, 13 (2025) 12. https://doi.org/10.4236/msce.2025.139002

-[11] K. Nishizawa, M. Okada, E. Watanabe, Materials Sciences and Applications, 5 (2014) 112. https://doi.org/10.4236/msa.2014.53016.

-[12] V. Guzmán-Velderrain, Y. Ortega López, J. Salinas Gutiérrez, A. López Ortiz, V. H. Collins-Martínez, Green and Sustainable Chemistry, 4 (2014) 120. https://doi.org/10.4236/gsc.2014.43017

-[13] J. C. Morales Mejia, L. Angeles, R. Almanza, Computational Water, Energy, and Environmental Engineering, 3 (2014) 36. https://doi.org/10.4236/cweee.2014.31005

-[14] M. J. AlSultani, M. F. A. Alias, Experimental and Theoretical NANOTECHNOLOGY, 9 (2025), 103 https://doi.org/10.56053/9.S.103

-[15] A. Nilchi, S. Janitabar-Darzi, S. Rasouli-Garmarodi, Materials Sciences and Applications, 2 (2011) 476. https://doi.org/10.4236/msa.2011.25064.

-[16] K. K. Kasem, A. Finley, J. Folberth, M. Syed, E. Kirkpatrick, Materials Sciences and Applications, 3 (2012) 265. https://doi.org/10.4236/msa.2012.35039

-[17] K. K. Kasem, H. Ramey, V. Ahmed, Materials Sciences and Applications, 4 (2013) 637. https://doi.org/10.4236/msa.2013.410078

-[18] P. Paschalidou, C. R. Theocharis, Materials Sciences and Applications, 11 (2020) 715. https://doi.org/10.4236/msa.2020.1111048

-[19] S. Tanigawa, T. Takashima, H. Irie, Journal of Materials Science and Chemical Engineering, 5 (2017) 129. https://doi.org/10.4236/msce.2017.51017

-[20] Hala Majed Mohi, Enas Ajil Jasim, Aya Adnan Mousa Abd, Experimental and Theoretical NANOTECHNOLOGY, 9 (2025), 115 https://doi.org/10.56053/9.S.115

-[21] S. Yamauchi, S. Saiki, K. Ishibashi, A. Nakagawa, S. Hatakeyama, Journal of Crystallization Process and Technology, 4 (2014) 79. https://doi.org/10.4236/jcpt.2014.42011

-[22] M. R. Meghana, H. A. Deepa, R. Ravishankar, International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology, 8 (2019) 33 https://doi.org/10.17577/IJERTV8IS080277

-[23] Athraa Ali Salman, Fouad K. Mashee Al Ramahi, Inbethaq M-Ali Abdulameer, Duaa Haidar M. Ali, Experimental and Theoretical NANOTECHNOLOGY, 9 (2025), 123 https://doi.org/10.56053/9.S.123

-[24] M. Z. Sahdan, N. Nayan, S. H. Dahlan, M. E. Mahmoud, U. Hashim, Advances in Materials Physics and Chemistry, 2 (2012) 16. https://doi.org/10.4236/ampc.2012.24B005

-[25] M. Kaneko, Asian Journal of Physical and Chemical Sciences, 11 (2023) 42. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajopacs/2023/v11i1195

-[26] N. A. Al-Omair, S. M. Reda, F. M. Al-Hajri, Advances in Materials Physics and Chemistry, 4 (2014) 29. https://doi.org/10.4236/ampc.2014.42005

-[27] J. Bandy, Q. Zhang, G. Cao, Materials Sciences and Applications, 2 (2011) 1427. https://doi.org/10.4236/msa.2011.210193

-[28] U. Soni, V. N. Shukla, R. C. Prajapati, S. Surve, International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology, 9 (2020). https://doi.org/10.17577/IJERTV9IS040442

-[29] H. I. Ahmed, AIP Conference Proceedings, 2235 (2020) 020038. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0008913

-[30] H. Hasan, A. Nooruldeen, H. I. Ahmed, and M. J. Jaafer, Periodicals of Engineering and Natural Sciences (PEN), 8 (2020) 2 727. https://doi.org/10.21533/pen.v8.i2.1100

-[31] H. I. Ahmed, AIP Conference Proceedings, 2235 (2020) 020038. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0008913

-[32] Eman M. Al-zoubaidi, Essa A.F., Hayder S. Musa, Experimental and Theoretical NANOTECHNOLOGY, 9 (2025), 135 https://doi.org/10.56053/9.S.135

Downloads

Published

2026-10-15

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Role of Fe doping on crystallographic and functional characteristics of ceramic TiO2 . (2026). Experimental and Theoretical NANOTECHNOLOGY, 10(4), 2057-2071. https://doi.org/10.56053/10.4.2057