Thermal extraction and physicochemical characterization of nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite from bovine bone waste

Authors

  • Marwan N. Arbilei College of Biomedical Engineering, University of Technology- Iraq, Baghdad, Iraq Author
  • Wasan A. Muslim College of Production Engineering and Metallurgy, University of Technology- Iraq, Baghdad, Iraq Author
  • M. Al Nuaimi College of Production Engineering and Metallurgy, University of Technology- Iraq, Baghdad, Iraq Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56053/10.4.1791

Keywords:

Hydroxyapatite, Bovine bone waste, Thermal, Nanocrystalline, Biomedical

Abstract

This research demonstrated the feasibility of extracting nanostructured hydroxyapatite (HAp) from bovine bone waste through controlled thermal calcination at 600, 800, and 1000 °C. Thermal analysis showed mass losses of 32.50–34.90%, reflecting progressive removal of the organic matrix. Updated XRD analysis confirmed the HAp diffraction fingerprint in all calcined samples but revealed a non-monotonic structural response: H2 (800 °C) produced the largest apparent crystallite size (100.09 nm), the highest crystallinity proxy (96.4%), and the lowest microstrain (2.207 × 10⁻³), whereas H3 and H1 both showed crystallite sizes of 19.91 nm, crystallinity proxies of 92.7%, and microstrain values of 9.211 × 10⁻³. The phase-purity proxy is highest for H3 and H1 (90.6%) and lower for H2 (88.2%), indicating that crystallinity and phase-purity proxies should be interpreted separately. The additional comparative curves for crystallite size, microstrain, crystallinity, and phase purity visualize these temperature-dependent differences. FTIR confirmed characteristic phosphate and structural hydroxyl bands, with H2 showing the clearest overall HAp fingerprint and H1 the lowest prominence of collagen-related bands. DLS identified a small effective hydrodynamic diameter of 15.1 nm and a low polydispersity index of 0.289 for H1, while SEM showed progressive development of granular and faceted morphologies. Overall, 800 °C favored XRD lattice ordering and FTIR definition, whereas 1000 °C favored organic removal and dispersion behavior; therefore, the optimum calcination condition depends on the targeted structural, chemical, or particulate property.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

-[1] Ahmed Suhail Hussein, Noor Khalid Ismael, Asaad T. Al-Douri, Abbas Saeb Zaham, Ali Y. Alwan, Mais Qasem Mohammed, Sama Amer Abbas El-Tekreti, Shaimaa Tarik Mahmood, Saeb Jasim Mohammed Alnajm, Younis W. Younis, Maksood Adil Mahmoud Al-Doori, Experimental and Theoretical NANOTECHNOLOGY, 9 (2025) 505 https://doi.org/10.56053/9.3.505

-[2] Saad Ahmed Alnuaimi, D. Vaishnavi, Huda Ghazi Hameed, Experimental and Theoretical NANOTECHNOLOGY, 9 (2025) 513 https://doi.org/10.56053/9.3.513

-[3] S. Vadaei, H. Faghihian, Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology, 58 (2018) 45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.etap.2017.12.019

-[4] D. K. Bhat, U. S. Shenoy, Materials Today Physics, 4 (2018) 12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtphys.2017.11.003

-[5] A. Hmood, A. Kadhim, H. A. Hassam, Superlattices and Microstructures, 76 (2014) 36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spmi.2014.09.016

-[6] G. H. Patel, S. H. Chaki, R. M. Kannaujiya, Z. R. Parekh, A. B. Hirpara, A. J. Khimani, M. P. Deshpande, Physica B: Condensed Matter, 613 (2021) 412987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physb.2021.412987

-[7] K. C. Kwon, J. H. Baek, K. Hong, S. Y. Kim, H. W. Jang, Nano-Micro Letters, 14 (2022) 58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-022-00813-8

-[8] A. K. Singh, B. S. Yadav, A. K. Vishwakarma, S. Kumar, F. Ahmad, P. Kumar, N. Kumar, Journal of Electronic Materials, 52 (2023) 7132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11664-023-10624-8

-[9] A. A. Taskin, F. Yang, S. Sasaki, K. Segawa, Y. Ando, Physical Review B, 89 (2014) 121302. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.89.121302

-[10] J. Liu, X. Li, H. Wang, G. Yuan, A. Suvorova, S. Gain, W. Lei, ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 12 (2020) 31810. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c07318

-[11] T. Jiang, Y. Zang, H. Sun, X. Zheng, Y. Liu, Y. Gong, K. He, Advanced Optical Materials, 5 (2017) 1600727. https://doi.org/10.1002/adom.201600727

-[12] K. Tsuboi, N. Su, S. Kobayashi, K. Sugimoto, M. Kobayashi, Journal of Crystal Growth, 597 (2022) 126805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2022.126805

-[13] A. Ashfaq, E. A. Shokralla, A. Ali, M. M. Sabugaa, M. A. Fahmy, S. A. M. Abdelmohsen, M. Y. Ali, A. Baig, O. A. Algethami, M. Abboud, Inorganic Chemistry Communications, 153 (2023) 110790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inoche.2023.110790

-[14] R. M. Kannaujiya, S. H. Chaki, A. J. Khimani, Z. R. Parekh, A. B. Hirpara, S. S. Soni, S. N. Bariya, M. P. Deshpande, Surfaces and Interfaces, 45 (2024) 103788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfin.2024.103788

-[15] Y. K. Lee, E. S. Park, C. Yoo, W. Kim, J. W. Jeon, M. Ha, C. S. Hwang, Crystal Growth & Design, 20 (2020) 4649. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.cgd.0c00338

-[16] Z. Weng, S. Ma, H. Zhu, Z. Ye, T. Shu, J. Zhou, X. Wu, H. Wu, Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 179 (2018) 276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2018.02.020

-[17] M. A. Hossain, M. T. Rahman, M. Khatun, E. Haque. Computational Condensed Matter, 15, 31 (2018) doi.org/10.1016/j.cocom.2018.03.006

-[18] M. Wortmann, B. Bednarz, N. B. Nezafat, K. Viertel, O. Kuschel, J. Schmalhorst, I. Ennen, M. Gärner, N. Frese, G. Jakob, J. Wollschläger, G. Schierning, A. Hütten, T. Kuschel, Applied Surface Science, 713 (2025) 164356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2025.164356

-[19] M. Muthumari, M. Manjula, P. Veluswamy, D. V. Kuznetsov, Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids, 176 (2023) 111232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpcs.2023.111232

-[20] Z. L. Liu, Z. L. Guo, L. Deng, Inorganic Chemistry, 63 (2024) 5389. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.3c04368

-[21] A. Bugalia, V. Gupta, A. Pandey, Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 57 (2024) 195502. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6463/ad2d76

-[22] G. Jamwal, A. Kumar, M. Warish, S. Chakravarty, S. Muthiah, A. Kandasami, A. Niazi, Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 954 (2023) 170182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2023.170182

-[23] E. A. Shokralla, A. Ashfaq, H. Alqurashi, L. G. Alharbe, E. G. Hanna, M. A. Fahmy, R. R. Macadangdang Jr., S. H. Alrefaee, R. S. Almufarij, A. R. Abd-Elwahed, Ceramics International, 50 (2024) 34467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2024.05.262

-[24] Haneen Khaled Naji Al-Samarrai, Osama Nadhom Nijris, Mohammed Fadhil AboKsou, Experimental and Theoretical NANOTECHNOLOGY, 9 (2025) 529 https://doi.org/10.56053/9.4.529

-[25] Saeed S. Ba Hashwan, Mohd Haris Md Khir, Illani Mohd Nawi, Muzamil A. Hassan, Abdullah S. Algamili, Hussein Shutari, Experimental and Theoretical NANOTECHNOLOGY, 9 (2025) 539 https://doi.org/10.56053/9.4.539

-[26] Maksood Adil Mahmoud Al-Doori, Nahedh Ayad Faris, Noor Adnan Mahmood, Asaad T. Al-Douri, Luay Mannaa ibrahim, Amna M. Al-Tikrity, Experimental and Theoretical NANOTECHNOLOGY, 9 (2025) 555 https://doi.org/10.56053/9.4.555

-[27] Asaad T. Al-Douri, Alaa A. Khaleel, Luay Mannaa ibrahim, Abeer Talib Abdulqader, Ammr Khalid Shihab, Mustafa Khaleel Ibrahim, Maksood Adil Mahmoud Al-Doori, Experimental and Theoretical NANOTECHNOLOGY, 9 (2025) 563 https://doi.org/10.56053/9.4.563

-[28] Hayder Subhi FAISAL, Cezar Mohamed Ahmed, Ayaa Ayad abeed, Mais Qasem Mohammed, Asaad T. Al-Douri, Semaa Amer Ghanam, Zeena T. Khattab, Aya Abdullateef Ezat, Maksood Adil Mahmoud Al-Doori, Nida Muhsin Ali, Mohammed Ameri, Mohammad Mutlag Salih, Experimental and Theoretical NANOTECHNOLOGY, 9 (2025) 571 https://doi.org/10.56053/9.4.571

-[29] Saif Saad Alnuaimi, B. Bazeer Ahamed, Mustafa Mohammed Rashid Al-Nuaimi, Experimental and Theoretical NANOTECHNOLOGY, 10 (2026) 1 https://doi.org/10.56053/10.1.1

Downloads

Published

2026-10-15

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Thermal extraction and physicochemical characterization of nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite from bovine bone waste. (2026). Experimental and Theoretical NANOTECHNOLOGY, 10(4), 1791-1812. https://doi.org/10.56053/10.4.1791