Performance of under-reamed piles in saturated clay examining effects of bulb configuration on compression and uplift behaviour

Authors

  • Ali F. Al-Baidhani Department of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, Al-Nahrain University, Baghdad, Iraq Author
  • Abdul Aziz A. Al-kifae Department of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, Al-Nahrain University, Baghdad, Iraq Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56053/10.3.1611

Keywords:

Under-reamed Piles, Bulb Geometry, Ultimate bearing capacity, Compressive load, Tension load

Abstract

Recent advancements in nanotechnology have enhanced the understanding of cohesive soils and supported more efficient foundation solutions. This study experimentally examines the compression and uplift behavior of straight and under-reamed piles with varying bulb numbers to clarify their role in soil–pile interaction. Four small-scale aluminum pile models, a straight pile, and under-reamed piles with one, two, and three bulbs are tested in reconstituted saturated clay (CL) using a 450 mm embedment depth inside a rigid 600 × 600 × 600 mm steel container. Axial compression and uplift tests are conducted to assess load–load-displacement response, ultimate capacity, and changes in load-transfer mechanisms. Results show that under-reaming significantly improves pile performance. Compressive capacity relative to the straight pile increased by 42%, 108%, and 149% for the one, two, and three bulb piles, respectively. Load-transfer analysis revealed a shift from friction-dominated resistance toward end-bearing dominance. For the straight pile, shaft friction contributed 55% of total resistance, decreasing to 35%, 22%, and 18% for the one, two, and three bulb piles, respectively, indicating reduced frictional mobilization with increasing bulb number. Correspondingly, soil pressure beneath the pile tip decreased by 20–25% for single bulbs and up to 40% for double bulbs, confirming stress redistribution toward enlarged bases. Under uplift loading, performance also improved, with ultimate capacity increasing by 89%, 120%, and 186% for the one, two, and three bulb piles, respectively. These results show the strong influence of bulb geometry in modifying stress paths, enhancing end-bearing engagement, and reducing frictional reliance. Overall, the findings provide a quantitative basis for optimizing under-reamed pile configurations in saturated cohesive soils and improving foundation design efficiency.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

-[1] Nadia Farid Hassan Sabri, Jassim Muhsin Nasser, Experimental and Theoretical NANOTECHNOLOGY, 10 (2026) 835 https://doi.org/10.56053/10.S.835

-[2] M. Majumder, D. Chakraborty, Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. 15 (2021) 537.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-021-0708-x

-[3] V. Chandrasekaran, K.G. Garg, C. Prakash, Soils Found. 18 (1978) 1.

https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.18.2_1

-[4] B. George, G. Hari, Indian Geotech. J. 46 (2016) 89.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-015-0157-3

-[5] V.N. Khatri, A. Kumar, S.K. Gupta, R.K. Dutta, T. Gnananandarao, Int. J. Geotech. Eng. 16 (2022) 438. https://doi.org/10.1080/19386362.2019.1660527

-[6] R. Vali, E.M. Khotbehsara, M. Saberian, J. Li, M. Mehrinejad, S. Jahandari, Int. J. Geotech. Eng. 13 (2019) 236.https://doi.org/10.1080/19386362.2017.1336586

-[7] A.M.J. Alhassani, Int. J. Eng. 34 (2021) 1940 https://doi.org/10.5829/IJE.2021.34.08B.15

-[8] Haitham Mohammed Ibrahim Al-Zuhairi, Iqbal alshalal, Hind H. Abbood, M. Al Nuaimi, Experimental and Theoretical NANOTECHNOLOGY, 10 (2026) 855 https://doi.org/10.56053/10.S.855

-[9] F.H. Rahil, M.A. Al-Neami, K.A.N. Al-Zaho, Eng. Technol. J. 34 (2016) 1206 https://doi.org/10.30684/etj.34.6A.15

-[10] M.S. Al-Tememy, M.A. Al-Neami, M.F. Asswad, Eng. Technol. J. 40 (2022) 1 https://doi.org/10.30684/etj.2021.131818.1062

-[11] R.E. Martin, R.A. DeStephen, J. Geotech. Eng. 109 (1983) 1082 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1983)109:8(1082)

-[12] J.A. Peter, N. Lakshmanan, P.D. Manoharan, J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 18 (2006) 408.

https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2006)18:3(408)

-[13] H.M. Ziyara, B.S. Albusoda, IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 856 (2021) 012052.

https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/856/1/012052

-[14] Ketam Kadom Khudair, Farouk Boudou, Abeer Mohammed, Abdelghani Sehmi, Amal Belakredar, M. S. Ibrahim, Experimental and Theoretical NANOTECHNOLOGY, 10 (2026) 869 https://doi.org/10.56053/10.S.869

-[15] M. S. Ibrahim, Tarik T. Issa, Bilal Yaqoob, Etmad Naji Fayyadh, Ahmed Rashid, Ruqaya Shaker Mahmood, Experimental and Theoretical NANOTECHNOLOGY, 10 (2026) 887 https://doi.org/10.56053/10.S.887

-[16] M.A. Hayder, K.M. Omar, G.J. Amer, E3S Web Conf. 318 (2021) 01015.

https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202131801015

-[17] H.O. Abbas, IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 1076 (2021) 012094.

https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1076/1/012094

-[18] Bureau of Indian Standards, IS 2911: Code of Practice for Design and Construction of Pile Foundations, Parts 1–4, BIS, New Delhi, 2010–2021.

-[19] ASTM International, ASTM D854-14: Standard Test Methods for Specific Gravity of Soil Solids by Water Pycnometer, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2014.

-[20] ASTM International, ASTM D4318-17: Standard Test Methods for Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit, and Plasticity Index of Soils, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2017.

-[21] ASTM International, ASTM D422-63(2007): Standard Test Method for Particle-Size Analysis of Soils, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2007.

-[22] ASTM International, ASTM D1557-12: Standard Test Methods for Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil Using Modified Effort, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2012.

-[23] S. Prakash, H.D. Sharma, Pile Foundation in Engineering Practice, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1990

-[24] Alyaa Hussain, Ibtihal A. Mahmood, Hussein A. Hussein, Experimental and Theoretical NANOTECHNOLOGY, 10 (2026) 907 https://doi.org/10.56053/10.S.907

-[25] P. Kumar, S. Raina, Int. J. Geomech. 14 (2014) 04014036 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000409

-[26] G.G. Meyerhof, Can. Geotech. J. 1 (1963) 16 https://doi.org/10.1139/t63-003

-[27] ASTM International, ASTM D1143/D1143M-20: Standard Test Methods for Deep Foundations Under Static Axial Compressive Load, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2020.

-[28] A.T. Jaber, N.S. Rahim, Exp. Theo. NANOTECHNOLOGY 5 (2021) 57 https://doi.org/10.56053/5.1.57

-[29] A.M.A. Hassan et al., Exp. Theo. NANOTECHNOLOGY 2 (2018) 91 https://doi.org/10.56053/2.2.91

-[30] Ruqayah M. Jawad, Hayder S. Hussain, Experimental and Theoretical NANOTECHNOLOGY, 10 (2026) 979 https://doi.org/10.56053/10.S.979

Downloads

Published

2026-07-15

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Performance of under-reamed piles in saturated clay examining effects of bulb configuration on compression and uplift behaviour. (2026). Experimental and Theoretical NANOTECHNOLOGY, 10(3), 1611-1624. https://doi.org/10.56053/10.3.1611