Graphene oxide nanostructure: Structural properties for high-performance nanoelectronics

Authors

  • Salah OUDJERTLI Research Center in Industrial Technologies (CRTI), P.O. Box 64, Roade of Dely Brahim, Cheraga 16014 Algiers, Algeria Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56053/10.3.1165

Keywords:

Graphene, rGO, Mobility, Conductivity, Mechanical

Abstract

Reduced graphene oxide (rGO) nanostructured films are produced by chemical reduction of graphene oxide with hydrazine hydrate. Structural, electrical, and mechanical properties are measured on the same sample set not on separate batches, not inferred from synthesis conditions, but characterised directly and in sequence. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns collected over 2θ = 5°–80° (Cu Kα, λ = 0.15406 nm) display a dominant (002) reflection at 2θ ≈ 25.4°, a secondary (100) reflection at 2θ ≈ 43.5°, and weaker (004) and (110) features, confirming the hexagonal graphitic symmetry of the partially restored sp² network. Scherrer analysis of the (002) reflection applying D = Kλ/(β cosθ) with K = 0.89, an instrument-corrected FWHM β = 0.0453 rad, and a Bragg angle θ = 12.70° places the mean coherent stacking length D ≈ 3.2 nm (interlayer spacing d₀₀₂ = 0.350 nm), confirming the nanocrystalline character of the films. A structural parameter table (Table 1) summarises all XRD-derived quantities, including d-spacing, crystallite size, and micro-strain. Hall effect measurements give a zero-field electron mobility of 2450 cm²·V⁻¹·s⁻¹ and p-type carrier character; four-point probe conductivity (σ ≈ 350 S·m⁻¹) confirms Ohmic transport across the percolating sp² network. Uniaxial tensile testing shows rGO sustaining ~28–32 MPa threefold to fourfold above the graphene oxide precursor (~7–9 MPa). Three-point bending tests identify two mechanically distinct regimes: a linear elastic response (k ≈ 0.145 N·mm⁻¹) up to 3.2 N, beyond which deflection reaches 44 mm at 5 N and effective stiffness falls to ~0.08 N·mm⁻¹. The results provide quantitative benchmarks for flexible nanoelectronic substrates, conformable nanosensor platforms, and optoelectronic devices.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

-[1] A.K. Geim, K.S. Novoselov, Nat. Mater. 6 (2007) 183. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat1849

-[2] M. Xu, T. Liang, M. Shi, H. Chen, Chem. Rev. 113 (2013) 3766. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr300263a

-[3] X. Li, W. Cai, J. An, S. Kim, J. Nah, D. Yang, R. Piner, A. Velamakanni, I. Jung, E. Tutuc, S.K. Banerjee, L. Colombo, R.S. Ruoff, Science 324 (2009) 1312. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1171245

-[4] S. Pei, H.-M. Cheng, Carbon 50 (2012) 3210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2011.11.010

-[5] K.S. Novoselov, A.K. Geim, S.V. Morozov, D. Jiang, M.I. Katsnelson, I.V. Grigorieva, S.V. Dubonos, A.A. Firsov, Nature 438 (2005) 197. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04233

-[6] K.I. Bolotin, K.J. Sikes, Z. Jiang, M. Klima, G. Fudenberg, J. Hone, P. Kim, H.L. Stormer, Solid State Commun. 146 (2008) 351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssc.2008.02.024

-[7] C. Lee, X. Wei, J.W. Kysar, J. Hone, Science 321 (2008) 385. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1157996

-[8] F. Giannazzo, F. Bondino, L. Seravalli, S. Agnello, Nanomaterials 15 (2025) 851. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano15110851

-[9] J. Sutaria, C. Staii, Molecules 30 (2025) 3929. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30193929

-[10] M. Zhan, M. Xu, W. Lin, H. He, C. He, Nanomaterials 15 (2025) 507. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano15070507

-[11] F. Giannazzo, F. Bondino, L. Seravalli, S. Agnello, Nanomaterials 15 (2025) 851. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano15110851

-[12] M. Zhu, Nanomaterials 15 (2025) 1823. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano15231823

-[13] X. Li, Int. J. Mol. Sci. 26 (2025) 765. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26020765

-[14] Z. Mustafa, D. Kumar, B.P. Swain et al., Sci. Rep. 16 (2026) 536. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-29897-0

-[15] Mais Qasem Mohammed, Ahmed Hamed Mahde Shugran, Experimental and Theoretical NANOTECHNOLOGY 10 (2026) 13 https://doi.org/10.56053/10.1.13

-[16] Lafi AL NUFAIE, Experimental and Theoretical NANOTECHNOLOGY 10 (2026) 37 https://doi.org/10.56053/10.1.37

-[17] Raghad A. Rasheed, Maysoon F. A. Alias, Experimental and Theoretical NANOTECHNOLOGY 10 (2026) 69 https://doi.org/10.56053/10.1.69

-[18] Ali Maher alshammari, Tagreed K Hamad, Alaa Jabbar Ghazai, Mohamed Dammak, Experimental and Theoretical NANOTECHNOLOGY 10 (2026) 131 https://doi.org/10.56053/10.1.131

-[19] Fatima J Musaa, Hanaa J. Kadhim Alesa, Experimental and Theoretical NANOTECHNOLOGY 10 (2026) 197 https://doi.org/10.56053/10.S.197

Downloads

Published

2026-07-15

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Graphene oxide nanostructure: Structural properties for high-performance nanoelectronics . (2026). Experimental and Theoretical NANOTECHNOLOGY, 10(3), 1165-1175. https://doi.org/10.56053/10.3.1165