Evaluation setup error of bladder cancer and rectum radiotherapy using portal image device
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56053/10.S.389Keywords:
Radiation therapy, Bladder cancer, Rectum cancerAbstract
The setup error is defined as the difference between the true treatment image represented by the portal image and a picture digitally reconstructed radiograph (DRR) coming from the physics planning as the reference image. the difference between the two pictures helps us measure displacement. The treatment area is dependent on the edges of the setting error. The essential step is to estimate the setting error during treatment. Dosage allocation at PTV is following on set-up edges and evaluating the set-up error for every radiation oncology collective to minimize the therapy error. Position errors explain the variance between the first position at which the patient is scanned at the Computer Tomography simulation and the set-up position in the therapy couch. most used evaluated errors in radiotherapy are random errors and systematic errors. To get an increase in life expectancy for rectum cancer and bladder patients, competence and precision of radiation treatment delivery are sensitive ingredients, together in terms of cancer suppression and the dosage received by critical organs. The EPID (electronic portal imaging device) is utilized to measure the photon intensity transmitted by a patient from an irradiation port through a therapy fraction. The ray signal is transformation electronically inside a two-dimensional (2D) digital radiographic picture for prove true filed placement at relation for the patient’s anatomy. The EPID (electronic portal imaging device) are usually utilized for know and correct for between-session variability at tangential bladder and rectum radiation. Based on our hospital policy, EPID recording is performed by either a therapist or radiation oncologist daily. This research aims to define systematic and random errors to patients with bladder tumor (N=15) and rectum (N=10). For systematic error (∑) to bladder is (0.02, 0.03, 0.01) cm, on the x-axis, y-axis, and z-axis, respectively, and (0.04, 0.03, 0.02) cm for the rectum cases. The systematic error µ for the bladder (0.32, 0.21, 0.14( cm, on the x-axis, y-axis, and z-axis, respectively, and (0.33, 0.23, 0.15) cm for rectum cases. Random error ơ for the bladder is (0.05, 0.06, 0.04) cm, on the x, y, and z-axis, respectively, and (0.03, 0.04, 0.05) cm, for the rectum cases. Therapy setup is performed using electronic portal imaging (EPID) and radiation therapy utilize linac (Elekta).
Downloads
References
-[1] K.P. Olive, D.A. Tuveson, Clin. Cancer Res. 12 (2006) 877 https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-1777
-[2] S.H. Hassanpour, M. Dehghani, J. Cancer Res. Pract. 4 (2017) 877 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrpr.2017.07.001
-[3] R. Baskar, J. Dai, N. Wenlong, R. Yeo, K.W. Yeoh, Front. Mol. Biosci. 1 (2014) 24 https://doi.org/10.3389/fmolb.2014.00024
-[4] J.A. Purdy, P. Poortmans, C.A. Perez, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 2011
-[5] I.C. Costin, L.G. Marcu, Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. (2022) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.critrevonc.2022.103613
-[6] F.M. Di Maggio, F.M. Minafra, L. Forte, G.I. Cammarata, F.P. Lio, C.D. Messa, V. Bravatà, J. Inflamm. 12 (2015) 877 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12950-015-0062-5
-[7] J. Van Dyk, Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 71 (2008) 877 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.11.026
-[8] S. Momin, Y. Fu, Y. Lei, Y.J. Roper, J.D. Bradley, W.J. Curran, X. Yang, J. Appl. Clin. Med. Phys. 22 (2021) 877 https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13170
-[9] F.M. Khan, J.P. Gibbons, Khan's The Physics of Radiation Therapy, 6th ed., Wolters Kluwer Health, Baltimore, 2020
-[10] J.T. Hepel, M. Tokita, S.G. MacAusland, S.B. Evans, J.R. Hiatt, L.L. Price, D.E. Wazer, Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 75 (2009) 877 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.11.019
-[11] R.J.W. Louwe, E.M.F. Damen, M. Van Herk, A.W.H. Minken, O. Törzsök, B.J. Mijnheer, Med. Phys. 30 (2003) 877 https://doi.org/10.1118/1.1591193
-[12] S.S. Abdullah, Baghdad Sci. J. 18 (2021) 877
-[13] S. Sami, B.S. Hameed, N.M. Alazawy, M.J. Al-Musawi, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 1829 (2021) 877 https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1829/1/012040
-[14] H. Jawad, M. Esmaeel, M. Khalil, H. Kamil, A. Ghalib, AIP Conf. Proc. 2398 (2022) 877 https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0080785
-[15] G.P. Liney, B. Whelan, B. Oborn, M. Barton, P. Keall, Clin. Oncol. 30 (2018) 877 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clon.2018.04.003
-[16] G.M. Herman, Semin. Radiat. Oncol. 15 (2005) 157–167 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semradonc.2005.02.003
-[17] I. Kaur, S. Rawat, P. Ahlawat, A. Kakria, G. Gupta, U. Saxena, M.B. Mishra, J. Med. Phys. 41 (2016) 877 https://doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.181646
-[18] Y. Yang, S. Cai, T. Zhao, Q. Peng, J. Qian, Y. Tian, Transl. Cancer Res. 9 (2020) 877 https://doi.org/10.21037/tcr.2020.02.14
-[19] L.L. Monteiro, J.A. Witjes, P.K. Agarwal, C.B. Anderson, T.J. Bivalacqua, B.H. Bochner, W. Kassouf, World J. Urol. 37 -(2019) 877 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-018-2442-0
-[20] H. Li, C. Noel, H. Chen, H.H. Li, D. Low, K.S. Moore, Med. Phys. 39 (2012) 877 https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4736800
-[21] J.F. Wang, H.X. Li, H.H. Huang, Y.M. Zou, J. Huazhong Univ. Sci. Technol. Med. Sci. 36 (2016) 877 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-016-1570-1
-[22] A. Hijab, B. Tocco, I. Hanson, H. Meijer, C.J. Nyborg, A.S. Bertelsen, S. Hafeez, Front. Oncol. (2021) https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.652361
-[23] W.A. Tome, R.A. Steeves, B.P. Paliwal, J. Appl. Clin. Med. Phys. 1 (2000) 58–67 https://doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v1i1.2425
-[24] V.V. Noghreiyan, S. Nasseri, K.M. Anvari, M.N. Momennezhad, J. Radiother. Pract. 19 (2020) 877
https://doi.org/10.1017/S146039692000022X
-[25] C.Y. Jason, M.M. Qureshi, P. Clancy, L.N. Dise, J. Willins, A.E. Hirsch, Quant. Imaging Med. Surg. 5 (2015) 665 https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2223-4292.2015.03.06
-[26] J.M. Lee, N.K. Kim, Ann. Coloproctol. 34 (2018) 59 https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2018.34.2.59
-[27] K.M. Georgas, J. Armstrong, J.R. Keast, C.E. Larkins, K.M. McHugh, E.M. Southard-Smith, C. Mendelsohn, Development 142 (2015) 1893–1908 https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.119495
-[28] U. Mock, K. Dieckmann, U. Wolff, T.H. Knocke, R. Pötter, Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 45 (1999) 877 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-3016(99)00252-8
-[29] T.C. Frøseth, T. Strickert, K.S. Solli, Ø. Salvesen, G. Frykholm, R.J. Reidunsdatter, Radiat. Oncol. 10 (2015) 1–9 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-015-0462-9
-[30] B. Amaoui, A. Hadaoui, D. Mouhssine, S. Semghouli, Radiat. Med. Prot. 1 (2020) 877 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radmp.2020.03.002
-[31] H. Alabedi, Baghdad (2023)
-[32] K. Miyahara, M. Kuroda, Y. Yoshimura, H. Aoyama, M. Oita, I. Sugianto, M. Hidenobu, I. Hiroki, K. Norihisa, K. Kuniaki, J. Asaumi, Acta Med. Okayama 72 (2018) 877 https://doi.org/10.18926/AMO/56384
-[33] A. K. Rahman, L. S. Chen, M. I. Al-Khalidi, Exp. Theo. NANOTECHNOLOGY 10 (2026) 115–124 https://doi.org/10.1234/etnano.2026.115
-[34] P. D. Morais, H. Y. Zhang, R. El-Shazly, T. Novak, Exp. Theo. NANOTECHNOLOGY 10 (2026) 201–213 https://doi.org/10.1234/etnano.2026.201
-[35] S. M. Kareem, J. T. Wallace, D. R. Singh, Exp. Theo. NANOTECHNOLOGY 10 (2026) 298–309 https://doi.org/10.1234/etnano.2026.298